Trust Formation with Blockchain Audit Trails in Vaccine Supply Chains: Implementation Study
Keywords:
Blockchain Technology, Vaccine Supply Chain, Trust Formation, Audit Trails, Cold Chain LogisticsAbstract
The distribution of temperature-sensitive pharmaceuticals, particularly vaccines, demands a highly coordinated and transparent supply chain to ensure efficacy and public safety. Traditional vaccine supply chains suffer from information asymmetry, fragmented data silos, and opaque accountability mechanisms, which collectively erode trust among stakeholders and end-users. This paper investigates the formation and transformation of inter-organizational trust through the implementation of blockchain-based audit trails in vaccine supply chains. Drawing upon empirical evidence from an extensive implementation study, this research assesses how immutable, decentralized ledger technologies shift the paradigm from relational trust to system-based cryptographic trust. By tracking physical vaccine vials integrated with Internet of Things temperature sensors alongside digital smart contracts, the study measures the impact of real-time visibility on stakeholder behavior and collaboration. The findings indicate that blockchain audit trails significantly reduce dispute resolution times and enhance confidence in cold chain integrity. Furthermore, the continuous and transparent recording of data transforms accountability, forcing supply chain actors to rely on algorithmic consensus rather than interpersonal assurances. This paper provides a comprehensive analysis of the technological, operational, and psychological dimensions of deploying distributed ledgers, offering critical insights into how systemic trust is formed and sustained in critical healthcare logistics.References
1. Cohen, I.K. Impact of the FDA Ban on Silicone Breast Implants. J. Surg. Oncol. 1994, 56, 1.
2. Janszen, G.; Arnoldi, M.; Vinci, V.; Klinger, M.; Di Landro, L. On the Safety of Implanted Breast Prostheses in Accidental Impacts. Materials 2023, 16, 4807.
3. Maxwell, J.C.; Harman, P.M. (Eds.) The Scientific Letters and Papers of James Clerk Maxwell, Volume I: 1846–1862; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1990.
4. Cole, S.R.; Edwards, J.K.; Greenland, S. Surprise! Am. J. Epidemiol. 2020, 190, 191–193.
5. Fisher, R.A. The fiducial argument in statistical inference. Ann. Eugen. 1935, 5, 391–398.
6. Cronin, T.D.; Brauer, R.O. Augmentation Mammaplasty. Surg. Clin. North Am. 1971, 51, 441–452.
7. Jesinger, R.A. Breast Anatomy for the Interventionalist. Tech. Vasc. Interv. Radiol. 2014, 17, 3–9.
8. Breast Augmentation Incision Sites. Available online: https://www.mayoclinic.org/tests-procedures/breast-augmentation/multimedia/breast-augmentation-incision-sites/img-20007382 (accessed on 1 April 2026).
9. Hidalgo, D.A.; Spector, J.A. Breast Augmentation. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 2014, 133, 567e–583e.
10. Pieri, A. Breast Implant Placement.
2023. Available online: https://andrewpieri.co.uk/?s=Breast+Implant+Placement (accessed on 1 April 2026).
11. Graziano, F.D.; Shay, P.L.; Sanati-Mehrizy, P.; Sbitany, H. Prepectoral Implant Reconstruction in the Setting of Post-Mastectomy Radiation. Gland Surg. 2021, 10, 411–416.
12. Kim, S.-E. Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction. Yeungnam Univ. J. Med. 2019, 36, 201–207.
13. Brown, T. Subfascial Breast Augmentation: Is There Any Advantage Over the Submammary Plane? Aesthetic Plast. Surg. 2012, 36, 566–569.
14. Spear, S.L.; Jespersen, M.R. Breast Implants: Saline or Silicone? Aesthet. Surg. J. 2010, 30, 557–570.
15. Swanson, E. Underestimating Implant Volumes in Cosmetic Breast Augmentation. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. Glob. Open 2017, 5, e1483.
16. Ghorbani, H.R.; Molaei, M. Antibacterial Nanocomposite Preparation of Polypropylene-Silver Using Corona Discharge. Prog. Org. Coat. 2017, 112, 187–190.
17. Nguyen, H.H.; To, L.T. Comparison Of Endoscopic Transaxillary And Peri-Areolar Approaches In Breast Augmentation with Smooth Implants. Aesthetic Plast. Surg. 2021, 45, 2665–2675.
18. Christodoulou, N.; Secanho, M.; Kokosis, G.; Malgor, R.D.; Winocour, J.; Yu, J.W.; Mathes, D.W.; Kaoutzanis, C. Capsular Contracture in Breast Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Plast. Reconstr. Aesthet. Surg. 2024, 98, 131–143.
19. Eurosilicone. M_GCA Combined Catalogue 2019; Eurosilicone: Apt, France, 2019.
20. CoGelTM—GC Aesthetics. Available online: https://gcaesthetics.vn/ (accessed on 7 March 2026).
21. Natrelle® | Breast Implants. Available online: https://www.allerganaesthetics.com/brands/natrelle (accessed on 7 March 2026).
22. Kiseleva, V.; Bagdasarian, A.; Vishnyakova, P.; Elchaninov, A.; Karyagina, V.; Rodionov, V.; Fatkhudinov, T.; Sukhikh, G. Three-Dimensional Disassemblable Scaffolds for Breast Reconstruction. Polymers 2025, 17, 2036.
23. Mohseni, M.; Bas, O.; Castro, N.J.; Schmutz, B.; Hutmacher, D.W. Additive Biomanufacturing of Scaffolds for Breast Reconstruction. Addit. Manuf. 2019, 30, 100845.
24. Carrillo-Gamboa, A.A.; del Rio-Martinez, C.J.; Rodriguez-Corpus, L.A.; Fukumoto-Inukai, K.A.; Cura-Rodríguez, L.D.; Mendoza-Vásquez, C.A.; Llamas-Ostos, A.N.; Téllez-Palacios, D. Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction with and without Acellular Dermal Matrix: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Gland Surg. 2025, 14, 2238–2257.
25. Sorenson, T.J.; Boyd, C.J.; Hemal, K.; Park, J.J.; Amro, C.; Vernice, N.; Lakatta, A.; Cohen, O.; Choi, M.; Karp, N. Outcome of Prepectoral Direct-to-Implant Breast Reconstruction with the Poly-4-Hydroxybutyrate Wrap. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. Glob. Open 2025, 13, e7268.
26. Daniels, A.U. Silicone Breast Implant Materials. Swiss Med. Wkly. 2012, 142, w13614.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Authors

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Articles are distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0), unless otherwise stated.